One of the joys of the internet is to find treasures such as the Jackson List of John Q. Barrett, Professor of Law, St. John’s University, New York City and Elizabeth S. Lenna Fellow, Robert H. Jackson Center, Jamestown, NY.  The Jackson List celebrates Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson but Barrett's post below also celebrates Pennsylvania Governor and United States Attorney General  Richard Thornburgh who passed away this past New Year's Eve.  Barrett uses Thornburgh's writings about Jackson to provide a powerful commentary about what happened last Wednesday in Washington, D.C.   Whether you agree or disagree with Barrett, and by extension, Thornburgh and Jackson, this is an interesting way to approach a discussion being held across the nation.

Best wishes, stay well and keep safe.

Pennsylvania Governor and United States Attorney General  Richard Thornburgh on Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, Security, Liberty, and Law

For the Jackson List:

Every good Attorney General of the United States studies and learns from the lives, words, work, and examples of his or her predecessors in that vital Cabinet office.

Attorney General Dick Thornburgh, who served from 1988-1991 under Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, was such an attorney general.  Thornburgh had a special interest in and high regard for his fellow Pennsylvania native, Robert H. Jackson.

Attorney General Jackson, at work in his office.Attorney General Jackson, at work in his office.

We know this from Attorney General Thornburgh’s writing.  In 2005, when Thornburgh was back in private law practice after decades and many roles in public service, he wrote in the Albany Law Review about Jackson, an Albany Law School alumnus.

Thornburgh’s specific topic was the preservation of national security and liberty.  He described what he saw as Jackson’s successes, at the Department of Justice, on the U.S. Supreme Court, and as U.S. chief prosecutor at Nuremberg of Nazi war criminals, in thinking about and using law practically, with discretion and balance, to advance the security in which individuals can have and exercise freedoms.  Thornburgh noted, quoting Jackson’s former law clerk William H. Rehnquist, that we call individual freedoms our civil liberties—they exist when people are under and loyal to an organized government that is their own.

Thornburgh was writing in a particular context, explaining and defending the USA PATRIOT law that the U.S. government enacted after the 9-11 terrorist attacks.  But much of his article applies generally to security and liberty.  Indeed, Thornburgh, in his article, highlighted topics that are contemporary:  incendiary speech and the violence, speaker crimes, breaches of peace, and threats to freedom and democratic government that such speech can produce.

To make this topic tangible, Thornburgh summarized the facts and issues and then Justice Jackson’s dissenting opinion in Terminiello v. Chicago, a 1949 Supreme Court case where the majority invalidated as unconstitutional a speaker’s criminal conviction for breach of the peace:

The case stems from Father Arthur Terminiello, a suspended Catholic Priest and follower of American fascist leader Gerald L.K. Smith, being found guilty of disorderly conduct in violation of a Chicago city ordinance.   Terminiello urged a mob of his sympathizers at a public meeting hall to rise up against a surrounding gathering of his critics.  Terminiello warned of the risk of a Communist revolution in the United States, labeled former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt a Communist, and condemned “atheistic, communistic . . . or Zionist Jews.”  He referred to the mob of his critics as “slimy scum that got in by mistake.”   Terminiello’s comments incited some members of the audience themselves to make callous remarks about Catholics, Jews, and African Americans, while inciting critics to throw bricks and rocks through the meeting hall windows and break down the auditorium doors.  The police experienced difficulty in controlling the mob, but ultimately arrested seventeen individuals and charged Terminiello with provoking the episode.

Thornburgh then summarized Jackson’s opinion, one of his most famous, dissenting from the Court judgment that the Constitution protected Terminiello in speaking and acting as he did: 

Jackson wrote:  “An old proverb warns us to take heed lest we ‘walk into a well from looking at the stars.’”   Jackson faulted the Court’s majority for considering liberty and order diametric opposites of one another:   “This Court seems to regard [liberty and order] as enemies of each other and to be of the view that we must forego order to achieve liberty.”  Referencing the Nazi conspiracy and aggression with which he was intimately aware, Jackson argued that governments must have the power to control the speech and activity of organized demonstrators and “revolutionary fanatics” or risk being overtaken by terrorist factions; this was the consequence of unchecked factions that arose in pre-World War II Europe.  He recognized that while the substance of Terminiello’s speech was protected…, Terminiello could not seek constitutional immunity for speech that incited such violence.  Jackson concluded his dissent with these historic words:  “The choice is not between order and liberty.  It is between liberty with order and anarchy without either.   There is danger that, if the Court does not temper its doctrinaire logic with a little practical wisdom, it will convert the constitutional Bill of Rights into a suicide pact.”

Thornburgh, in his article (linked below), addressed numerous topics, including national security and law challenges following 9-11, the PATRIOT act, terrorism, immigration, and criminal justice.

He also described some of Justice Jackson’s work at Nuremberg and quoted from other Jackson writings.  One that is especially striking today, following last week’s violent attack on the U.S. Capitol and Congress, is this sentence, which Thornburgh quoted from Jackson’s January 1954 address to the New York State Bar Association:

Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, and lesser imitators rejected the process of out-arguing and out-voting adversaries and … forcibly seized power, suppressed liberties and set up dictatorships.]

Richard Lewis (Dick) Thornburgh, age eighty-eight, died on December 31, 2020.

His life, words, work, and example, like Robert Jackson’s, are ours to study and relevant to our times and challenges.

Here are some links—

  • Dick Thornburgh, Balancing Civil Liberties and Homeland Security: Does the USA PATRIOT Act Avoid Justice Robert H. Jackson’s “Suicide Pact”, 68 Albany Law Review 801-13 (2005) (click here); 
  • Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949) (click here, and scroll down therein to Justice Jackson’s dissenting opinion); 
  • Thornburgh obituary/death notice, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (click here); 
  • Dick Thornburgh, Ex-Governor and U.S. Attorney General, Dies, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (click here);
U.S. Department of Justice portrait of Attorney General Dick Thornburgh
U.S. Department of Justice portrait of Attorney General Dick Thornburgh

*  *  *

As always, thank you very much for your interest, and please share this with others.

John Q. Barrett

Professor of Law, St. John’s University, New York City 

Elizabeth S. Lenna Fellow, Robert H. Jackson Center, Jamestown, NY

St. John's University School of Law

8000 Utopia Parkway
United States of America

Administrative details:  I send occasional Jackson List notes, which do not display recipient identities or email addresses, to people who are interested in Justice Robert H. Jackson, the Supreme Court, Nuremberg, and related topics.  To read archived versions of past posts, visit  If someone forwarded this note to you and you wish to join the Jackson List, subscribe here.

PCSS Online
Copyright © 2021 Pennsylvania Council for the Social Studies, All rights reserved.

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.